CLICK HERE FOR THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES »

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

V for Vendetta Analyzed

V’s speech to the people of London

The movie V for Vendetta takes place in London many years from now. It’s a story all about how Parliament takes over completely and the people of London are pushed to such injustice and oppression. A man named “V”, who is a survivor of one of the crudest forms of injustice, becomes a plotting revolutionist. He wears the mask of Guy Fawkes, who was a French revolutionist in the 1600’s. Fawkes lead a gunpowder treason to blow up Parliament symbolizing the government’s wrong doings. He planned it on November the fifth and wanted to embed it as a national holiday. Sadly, he did not succeed. V however, plans to lead the same kind of revolution. To do that, part of his plot includes the people of London. So on November the fifth, he takes over the media station and broadcasts a speech that persuades the people to be by his side in their own revolution.

In V’s speech to the people, he begins with a simple apology to London and confesses that he too “appreciates the comforts of the everyday routine, the security of the familiar, and the tranquility of repetition.” In saying this, he implies that he means them not to be dismayed from listening. He then goes on to say that November the fifth will be an important day.

V mentions that there are “those who do not want us to speak” and that he “suspects that orders are being given and men with guns will soon be on their way.” He starts to evaluate all the things that are happening, and they are believably true. V explains why the government would not want him to speak, and it is because “words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth.” These words appeal to the people’s intellect. Then V adds to that by boldly stating that there is something terribly wrong with the country. By using words such as “cruelty”, “injustice”, and “oppression” to describe the government, he starts to appeal to the audience’s emotions. He talks of how much the people are censored and have “systems of surveillance”. He speaks of it strongly implying that everyone knows what he is talking about; and especially the government. He blames the government, but he knows where the real blame lies. He tells the people “if you’re looking for the guilty, you need only to look into a mirror.” It is then very clear that he blames the people, and in return, the people know they are to blame.

By this point of V’s speech, he has totally turned the audience’s emotions. Then, by the change of tone in his voice, from calm but strong to very understanding; he starts to evaluate more of why the people are to be blamed. He says, “I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn’t be? War. Terror. Disease.” V plainly states that fear got the best of them and corrupted their common sense which is why they turned to the High Chancellor, who promised peace and demanded only their “silent, obedient consent.” By now, the people are stirred by the fact that they surrendered too many freedoms for the comfort and security of their own lives.

Next, V confessed to blowing up the Old Bailey the night before. The Old Bailey is one of the most important court houses in London; and on top stood a revised version of Lady Justice, none the less, she still stood for justice. His reasoning for such an act was simply to “remind the country of what it has forgotten”, which is justice, peace, and freedom. At this point, he starts his reasoning of a revolution with the people by giving history of November the fifth and the meaning for recreating it. He ends his speech with a powerful tone that completely grabs the people’s emotions even more. V states, “But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek…then I ask you to stand beside me, one year from tonight, outside the gates of Parliament. And together, we shall give them a fifth of November that shall never, ever be forgot!” This last statement creates unity, courage, and power for the people to take thier government back through an uprising.

1 comments:

Mr. Hughes said...

P1:
--Fawkes was English; be careful with your phrasing because it sounds like you're saying that Fawkes was a part of the French Revolution (which took place nearly 200 years after the Gunpowder Plot in England)
--in addition to stating the speaker's purpose, thesis sentence should also mention the rhetorical strategies you plan to discuss that explain how the speaker achieves his/her purpose

P2:
--only three sentences? this para. needs development; aim for 7-10 sentences
--analogy? explain the analogy you're referring to.

P3:
--if you include a quotation, you must analyze it; without the analysis, your analysis reads like a summary
--"things that are happening": explain these "things"
--how do these words you mention appeal to the audience's intellect. you must explain.
--i like that you mention V's words and immediately connect those words to V's purpose. good
--this para. covers too much ground and jumps to different discussions without adequate transitioning; divide the para. to contribute cohesion

P4:
--i like this para. you focus on how tone communicates purpose without jumping into a discussion on another aspect of V's argument

P5:
--you mention recreating November the fifth but you do not explain what V plans to do to recreate it; remember to connect solidly instead of assume; this is a very difficult but important step in writing; you have to get into the mind of your audience and try to reread your essay as if you're someone else reading these ideas for the first time.
--"completely grabs the audience's emotions even more" is a bit wordy
--you should divide this para. in half.
--you end on a good note; nice closure

PROS and CONS: see above

FINAL THOUGHTS: focus hard on the above suggestions for your next essay. organizing ideas seems to be a weak point for you, but it's not a tremendous weakness; i see evidence of organization here, but some areas lack this necessity